**Peer Review Journal ** DOI on demand of Author (Charges Apply) ** Fast Review and Publicaton Process ** Free E-Certificate to Each Author

Current Issues
     2026:7/2

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation

ISSN: (Print) | 2582-7138 (Online) | Impact Factor: 9.54 | Open Access

A critical discourse analysis of Joe Biden's justificatory speeches about the US the troops' withdrawal from Afghanistan

Full Text (PDF)

Open Access - Free to Download

Download Full Article (PDF)

Abstract

This paper conducts a critical discourse analysis of justification in the speeches of the American president of the United States of America, Joe Biden, about the US troops' withdrawal from Afghanistan. It aims to analyze the manipulative language that the American president uses in order to justify the decision to withdraw in 2021. The paper tries to bridge a gap in the linguistic research concerning critically investigating the concept of 'justification' in Biden's speeches. The analysis is done by answering the following questions: (1) What manipulative language strategies does the US president employ in his speech in order to justify his decision to withdraw? (2) What speech acts and rhetorical strategies does the president employ to persuade his audience to accept and support his decision to withdraw? The paper adopts van Dijk's (2006c) 'Discourse and Manipulation' as a model for analyzing the selected data. The paper concluded that the American president uses a particular effective and manipulative language in order to justify the decision to withdraw, and ideologically, the American president, depending on his status and power, tries to use particular speech acts and rhetorical strategies to impose his ideologies to get his decision justified.

How to Cite This Article

Ahmed Fleih Hassan, Dr. Sadiq Mahdi Kadhim Al Shamiri (2024). A critical discourse analysis of Joe Biden's justificatory speeches about the US the troops' withdrawal from Afghanistan . International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation (IJMRGE), 5(4), 839-844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2024.5.4.839-843

Share This Article: