International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation  |  ISSN (Online): 2582-7138  |  Double-Blind Peer Review  |  Open Access  |  CC BY 4.0

Current Issues
     2026:7/3

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation

ISSN (Online): 2582-7138 | Open Access

Addressing Students' Learning Loss through the National Learning Recovery Program: Teachers' Crucible Experiences

Full Text (PDF)

Open Access - Free to Download

Download Full Article (PDF)

Alternative download link

Abstract

This study sought to address the learning gaps of students based on the experiences of nine elementary school teachers in Cebu Province that were selected using purposive sampling, who participated in four NLRP subprograms: 1) National Learning Camp, 2) National Reading Program, 3) National Mathematics Program, and 4) National Science and Technology Program. Using  a  qualitative  descriptive  phenomenological  design,  the  researchers conducted 20-25-minute semi-structured interviews within the teachers’ school environment. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s thematic analysis, revealing five core themes: Challenges in the Program, Diversity and Learning Loss Recovery, Teaching Methods, Provision of Resources and Support, and Teacher Satisfaction and Professional Growth. The findings highlighted that while certain aspects of the NLRP effectively support student learning recovery, other areas would benefit from targeted reforms and improvements to meet the program’s goals more effectively. It also underscored the importance of incorporating teachers' experiences and insights into educational recovery initiatives as first-hand implementers. Expanding this research to other regions with a larger sample size, conducting a quantitative study and continuity of the program with the targeted reforms including regular teacher training, ample resources, and ongoing monitoring for better outcomes may further validate and strengthen the findings on NLRP’s impact.

 

How to Cite This Article

Wency Zack Abellanosa, Janelle Mae M Alutaya, Nadine Joy P Capacite, Smila May F Genolia, Rechelle Andrea B Marata, Angelito B Cabanilla Jr (2025). Addressing Students' Learning Loss through the National Learning Recovery Program: Teachers' Crucible Experiences . International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation (IJMRGE), 6(1), 352-362.

Export Citation:

BibTeX RIS EndNote

References

  1. 1. Adam EN, Bogler R. Theantecedentsofteachersatisfactionwithprofessionaldevelopmentprograms. Teachingand Teacher Education.2008;24(2\:377-386. doi:10.1016/j. tate.2007.03.002.
  2. 2. Azam S. Addressingstudentdiversityinscienceclassroom: Exploringtopic-specificpersonalpedagogicalcontentknowledgeofhighschoolteachers. Journalof Researchin Science Mathematicsand Technology Education.2020;3(3\:141-163. doi:10.31756/jrsmte.333.
  3. 3. Azevedo JP, Hasan A, Goldemberg D, Iqbal SA, Geven K. Simulatingthepotentialimpactsof COVID-19schoolclosuresonschoolingandlearningoutcomes: Asetofglobalestimates. World Banke Books, Washington, DC;
  4. 2020. Availablefrom: https://doi. org/10.1596/1813-9450-9284.
  5. 4. Baxter PE, Jack SM. Qualitativecasestudymethodology: Studydesignandimplementationfornoviceresearchers. Qualitative Report.2010;
  6. 13. Availablefrom: http://dx. doi. org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573.
  7. 5. Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Memberchecking. Qualitative Health Research.2016;26(13\:1802-1811. doi:10.1177/1049732316654870.
  8. 6. Bl?meke S, Jentsch A, Ross N, Kaiser G, K?nig J. Openinguptheblackbox: Teachercompetence, instructionalquality, andstudents'learningprogress. Learningand Instruction.
  9. 2022. Availablefrom: https://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0959475222000214.
  10. 7. Campbell S, etal. Purposivesampling: complexorsimple?Researchcaseexamples. Journalof Researchin Nursing.2020;25(8\:652-661. doi:10.1177/174498712092720.
  11. 8. Cortes K, Kortecamp K, Loeb S, Robinson CD. Ascalableapproachtohigh-impacttutoringforyoungreaders: Resultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial. Education Policy Analysis Archives.
  12. 2023. Availablefrom: https://cdn2. assets-servd. host/ifl-site/production/assets/downloads/Scalable-Approach-to-High-Impact-Tutoring-02_02_23. pdf.
  13. 9. Creswell JW. Researchdesign: Qualitative, quantitative, andmixedmethodsapproaches.5thed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications;
  14. 2018. Availablefrom: https://www. ucg. ac. me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell. pdf.
  15. 10. Ho LD, Limpaecher A. Whatisphenomenologicalresearchdesign?Essentialguidetocodingqualitativedata. Delve Tool Blog.2022 Mar
  16. 17. Availablefrom: https://delvetool. com/blog/phenomenology.
  17. 11. Departmentof Education. Adoptionofthe National Learning Recovery Programinthe Departmentof Education.2023 Jul
  18. 3. Availablefrom: https://www. deped. gov. ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2023_013. pdf.
  19. 12. Dianela JF, etal. Evaluationoftheeffectsofthe8-weekcompetenciesinmothertongue, Filipino, and English. International Journalof Researchand Scientific Innovation.2023;10(11\:139-
  20. 147. International Journalof Multidisciplinary Researchand Growth Evaluationwww. allmultidisciplinaryjournal. com361|Pagedoi:10.51244/IJRSI.2023.1011010.
  21. 13. Education Northwest. Instructionalgrouping. Education Northwest.
  22. 2019. Availablefrom: https://educationnorthwest. org/resources/instructional-grouping.
  23. 14. Gershenson S, Lomax E. Learningrecoveryandadiverseworkforce: Awin-winforstudentshardesthitby COVID-
  24. 19. Rockville, MD: National Comprehensive Centerat Westat;
  25. 2021. Availablefrom: https://compcenternetwork. org/sites/default/files/Learning%20 Recovery%20and%20a%20 Diverse%20 Workforce_Final. pdf.
  26. 15. Ghavifekr S, Rosdy WA. Teachingandlearningwithtechnology: Effectivenessof ICTintegrationinschools. International Journalof Researchin Educationand Science(IJRES\2015;1(2\:175-
  27. 191. Availablefrom: https://files. eric. ed. gov/fulltext/EJ1105224. pdf.
  28. 16. Harland J, Fletcher L, Morton C, Lord P, Styles B. Learningrecoveryin Yorkshireandthe Humber. National Foundationfor Educational Research;2022 Apr. Availablefrom: https://files. eric. ed. gov/fulltext/ED618889. pdf.
  29. 17. Hasanovaetal. Themaindifferencesbetweenteachingapproaches, methods, procedures, techniques, styles, andstrategies. Journal NX-AMultidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal.2021 Feb;7(2\:2581-
  30. 4230. Availablefrom: https://media. neliti. com/media/publications/342865-the-main-differences-between-teaching-ap-24a0895b. pdf.
  31. 18. Horikoshi K. Thepositivepsychologyofchallenge: Towardsinterdisciplinarystudiesofactivitiesandprocessesinvolvingchallenges. Frontiersin Psychology.2023;13:1090069. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1090069.
  32. 19. Hovhannisyan E. Theeffectivenessofdifferentteachingmethods. Edly.2023 May
  33. 18. Availablefrom: https://edly. io/blog/the-effectiveness-of-different-teaching-methods/.
  34. 20. Ibrahim WY, Umar HA, Clement I. Impactofschoolemicachievement. International Journalof Advanced Research.2017;5(12\:878-
  35. 889. Availablefrom: https://www. researchgate. net/publication/322423176_IMPACT_OF_SCHOOL_FACILITIES_ON_STUDENTS'_ACADEMIC_ACHIEVEMENT.
  36. 21. Ismajli H, Imami I. Differentiatedinstruction: Understandingandapplyinginteractivestrategiestomeettheneedsofallthestudents. International Journalof Instruction.2018;11(3\:207-
  37. 218. Availablefrom: https://eric. ed. gov/?id=EJ1183415.
  38. 22. Kaffenberger M. Modellingthelong-runlearningimpactofthe Covid-19learningshock: Actionsto(morethan\mitigateloss. International Journalof Educational Development.2020;81. doi:10.1016/j. ijedudev.2020.102326.
  39. 23. Litman L, Robinson J, Abberbock T. Turk Prime. com: Aversatilecrowdsourcingdataacquisitionplatformforthebehavioralsciences. Behavior Research Methods.2016;49(2\:433-442. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z.
  40. 24. Llego MA. Addressinglearninglossinthe Philippines: Acomprehensiveanalysisofthe National Learning Recovery Program. Teacher PH.2024 Jul
  41. 31. Availablefrom: https://www. teacherph. com/philippines-national-learning-recovery-program-analysis-recommendations/#National_Science_and_Technology_Program_NSci TP.
  42. 25. Magno C. Planningforthelearningrecovery: The Philippineexperience. CLADAsia Bulletin.2022;
  43. 4. Availablefrom: https://www. researchgate. net/publication/361799932_Planning_for_the_Learning_Recovery_The_Philippine_Experience.
  44. 26. Mancebo ME, Vaillant D. Learningrecoveryprograms: Assessingtheevidenceandpotentialfor Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank.
  45. 2021. Availablefrom: https://www. researchgate. net/publication/361118958_Learning_Recovery_Programs-_Assessing_the_Evidence_and_Potential_for_Latin_America.27. phenomenologicalmethod. The Psychologist.2015;28(8\:643-
  46. 644. Availablefrom: https://eprints. hud. ac. uk/id/eprint/26984/1/Morrow_et_a.
  47. 28. Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: Practicalguidancetoqualitativeresearch. Part3: Sampling, datacollectionandanalysis. European Journalof General Practice.2017;24(1\:9-18. doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091.
  48. 29. Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematicanalysis: Strivingtomeetthetrustworthinesscriteria. International Journalof Qualitative Methods.2017;16(1\. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
  49. 30. Olmscheid C. Readingfluency: Acriticalcomponentofreadinginstruction.1999 Mar
  50. 22. Availablefrom: https://eric. ed. gov/?id=ED430208.
  51. 31. Ondong J. Utilizationofschoolresourcesinbasiceducation: Amultiplecasestudy. Psychologyand Education: AMultidisciplinary Journal.2024;16(10\:1046-
  52. 1066. Availablefrom: https://scimatic. org/storage/journals/11/pdfs/2484. pdf.
  53. 32. Parida A. Evaluationoflearningrecoveryprogramme(LRP\insecondaryschoolsin Odisha. Research Gate.
  54. 2024. Availablefrom: https://www. researchgate. net/publication/379759008_Evaluation_of_Learning_Recovery_Programme_LRP_in_secondary_schools_in_Odisha.
  55. 33. Patil T, Giordano J. Ontheontologicalassumptionsofthemedicalmodelofpsychiatry: Philosophicalconsiderationsandpragmatictasks. Philosophy, Ethics, and Human Medicine.2010;5(3\:3. doi:10.1186/1747-5341-5-3.
  56. 34. Pokhrel S, Chhetri R. Aliteraturereviewonimpactof COVID-19pandemiconteachingandlearning. Higher Educationforthe Future.2021;8(1\:133-141. doi:10.1177/2347631120983481.
  57. 35. Radan M. Effectivenessofprojectreadingenablesyoung International Education Research.2022 Dec;18(5\:415-
  58. 429. Availablefrom: https://journals. cluteonline. com/index. php/JIER/article/view/14101.
  59. 36. Reyes EM, Sy RC, Lim V. Educationalinterventionsforlearningrecovery: Asystematicreview. International Journalof Educational Development.2024;73:1010-
  60. 1023. Availablefrom: International Journalof Multidisciplinary Researchand Growth Evaluationwww. allmultidisciplinaryjournal. com362|Pagehttps://doi. org/10.1016/j. ijedudev.2021.102319.
  61. 37. Rickman JP. Successfullearningstrategiesforsecondaryeducationinthepost-COVIDera. Researchin Educationand Practice.2023 Mar;2(7\:1-
  62. 9. Availablefrom: https://www. researchgate. net/publication/36598377.
  63. 38. Riddell A. Investigatingstudentperformanceindiverselearningsettings. International Journalof Educationaland Developmental Studies.2022;4(4\:102-
  64. 116. Availablefrom: https://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S2352012420302601.
  65. 39. Schmitt A. Howlearningrecoveryprogramscanbridgethegapcausedby COVID-19inunderperformingschools. Educationand Development.
  66. 2024. Availablefrom: https://www. researchgate. net/publication/367649014.

Share This Article: