International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation  |  ISSN (Online): 2582-7138  |  Double-Blind Peer Review  |  Open Access  |  CC BY 4.0

Current Issues
     2026:7/3

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation

ISSN (Online): 2582-7138 | Open Access

Development of ethnoscience based test assessment instrument to measure chemical literacy skill related to periodic table of elements material

Author(s):

Published:

Volume: 6 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1889-1896

Subject: Chemistry

Country: Indonesia

License: CC BY 4.0

Full Text (PDF)

Open Access - Free to Download

Download Full Article (PDF)

Alternative download link

Abstract

The background of this research is the lack of assessment instrument used to measure chemical literacy skills and the low understanding of students towards the implementation of chemical concepts in daily life. The aim of this research is to develop an ethnoscience-based assessment instrument to measure chemical literacy skills. This study is a research and development (Research and Development). The design of this study uses the 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). The subjects of this study were 16 students in a small-scale trial and 73 students in a large-scale trial. Data collection techniques in this study include interviews, questionnaires and tests. The data collection instruments used are interview sheets, validation sheets, test questions, assessment rubrics and student response sheets. The data analysis technique in this study starts from the analysis of validation data, empirical evidence with Aiken's V and analysis of small-scale trials which include content validity tests, construct validity, item validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and discrimination using the Rasch Model. The results of this study, namely the expert validation analysis obtained a total average score of 70/75 with a very valid category. Empirical evidence with Aiken's V obtained an Aiken's V index value is 0.91 with a valid category. Small-scale trials showed a construct validity result of 48.9% with a very good category, all items were valid, the Cronbach Alpha value was 0.80 with a high category, the level of difficulty of the questions was divided into 4 categories of difficulty, the person separation value was at a score of 2.25 with a sufficient category and item separation with a value of 2.09 with a sufficient category. The large-scale trial showed the results of construct validity of 21.9% with a good category, all questions were declared valid, the Cronbach Alpha value was 0.68 with a high category, the level of difficulty of the questions was divided into 4 categories of difficulty, the person separation value was at a score of 2.20 with a sufficient category and item separation with a value of 3.28 with a very good category, the profile of students' chemical literacy abilities in the small and large-scale trials was highest in the attitude aspect with an average percentage of 88.39% and 64.77% respectively. The responses of students in the large-scale trial were in the fairly good category with an average score of 3.72/5. The conclusion of this study is that the assessment instrument developed is declared eligible based on the results of content validation analysis, empirical evidence and small-scale trials.

How to Cite This Article

Benny Yanuar Dwi Satrio, Endang Susilaningsih, Woro Sumarni (2025). Development of ethnoscience based test assessment instrument to measure chemical literacy skill related to periodic table of elements material . International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation (IJMRGE), 6(1), 1889-1896.

Export Citation:

BibTeX RIS EndNote

References

  1. 1. Abidin Y. Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membacadan Menulis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara; c2018.
  2. 2. Aiken LR. Three Coefficientsfor Analyzingthe Reliabilityand Validityof Ratings. Educ Psychol Meas.1985;45(1\:131-
  3. 142. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/001316448504500115.
  4. 3. Aini Q, Novidayanti M, Basith A. Teknikdan Bentuk Evaluasi Pembelajaran Kurikulum Merdeka. JRev Pendidik Pengajaran.2023;7(1\:69-
  5. 74. DOI: https://doi. org/10.31004/jrpp. v7i1.23989.
  6. 4. Anderson LW. Assessing Learning: Designingand Implementing Effective Assessment Strategies. Routledge; c2020.
  7. 5. Arifin Z. Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya; c2011.
  8. 6. Arifin M. Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Teoridan Aplikasidalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: PTRaja Grafindo Persada; c2020.
  9. 7. Arikunto S. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; c2019.
  10. 8. Aryani SA, Susilowati E, Utami B. Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Kimiadan High Order Thinking Skills(HOTS\Siswa MIPAPada Materi Asam Basadi SMABatik1 Surakarta. JPendidik Kimia.2022;11(1\:60-
  11. 67. DOI: https://doi. org/10.20961/jmme. v11i1.52742.
  12. 9. Asrul AR, Rosnita. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Citapustaka Media; c
  13. 2015. International Journalof Multidisciplinary Researchand Growth Evaluationwww. allmultidisciplinaryjournal. com1894|Page
  14. 10. Azizah P, Yusmaita E. Pengembangan Butir Soal Literasi Kimiapada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Kelas XISMA/MA. EKJ: Edukimia.2022;4(2\:90-
  15. 94. DOI: https://doi. org/10.24036/ekj. v4. i2. a358.
  16. 11. Barke HD, Fisher RL, O'Rourke J. Chemistry Literacyinthe21st Century: Key Conceptsand Contemporary Issues. JChem Educ.2020;97(5\:1281-
  17. 1288. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1021/acs. jchemed.9b01074.
  18. 12. Budiastuti D, Bandur A. Validitasdan Reliabilitas Penelitian Dilengkapi Analisisdengan NVIVO, SPSS, dan AMOS. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media; c2018.
  19. 13. Chang R. Kimia Dasar: Konsep-Konsep Inti Edisi Ketiga Jilid
  20. 1. Jakarta: Erlangga; c2003.
  21. 14. Creswell JW. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitativeand Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson Education; c2012.
  22. 15. Dewi A. Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Kearifan Lokal: Integrasi Nilai-Nilai Budayadalam Pembelajaran. JPendidik Karakter.2020;3(1\:101-
  23. 115. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1234/jpk. v3i1.101.
  24. 16. Dewi CA, etal. Pentingnya Mengoptimalkan Literasi Kimia Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Isu-Isu Sosiosaintifikdi Abadke-
  25. 21. Seminar Nasional IPAXII.2022;348-359.
  26. 17. Dewi IN. Kearifan Lokaldalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam. Yogyakarta: Penerbit UGMPress; c2022.
  27. 18. Ernawi IS. Makalah Pada SCulture, Urban Future, Harmonisasi Penataan Ruangdan Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Ruang; c2010.
  28. 19. Fajri NMAK, Yusmaita E. Analisis Literasi Kimia Peserta Didikdi SMAN1 Batampada Topik Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimiadengan Model Rasch. JEksakta Pendidik.2021;5(1\:102-
  29. 109. DOI: https://doi. org/10.24036/jep/vol5-iss1/576.
  30. 20. Fakhri M, etal. Validitasdan Reliabilitas. JEduc.2024;6(2\:10967-
  31. 10975. DOI: https://doi. org/10.31004/joe. v6i2.4885.
  32. 21. Farida, Musyarofah A. Validitasdan Reliabilitasdalam Analisis Butir Soal. Al-Mu'arrib: JPendidik Bahasa Arab.2021;1(1\:34-
  33. 44. DOI: https://doi. org/10.32923/al-muarrib. v1i1.2100.
  34. 22. Faudah A, Susilawati, Nugraha AH, Sulisworo D. Respons Peserta Didikterhadap Program Edmododalam Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning. JIlmiah Fisika Pendidikdan Aplikasinya.2021;12(2\:
  35. 4953. DOI: https://doi. org/10.12928/bfi-jifpa. v12i2.20340.
  36. 23. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBMSPSSStatistics.5thed. SAGEPublications; c2022.
  37. 24. Henson RK. Reliabilityand Validity: The Essential Foundationsfor Researchand Practice. Routledge; c2022.
  38. 25. Hidayah IR, Kusmayadi TA, Fitriana L. Minimum Competency Assessment(AKM\: An Effortto Photograph Numeracy. JMath Math Educ.2021;11(1\:14-
  39. 20. DOI: https://doi. org/10.20961/jmme. v11i1.52742.
  40. 26. Holbrook J, Rannikmae M. Chemistry Literacy: AReviewof Key Issuesand Trendsinthe Global Education Context. Int JSci Educ.2021;43(9\:1574-
  41. 1587. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1920175.
  42. 27. Imaltin S. Studiliteratur: Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berbasis Literasi Kimiadi Indonesia. TSAQOFAH: JPenelit Guru Kimia.2024;4(2\:1116-
  43. 1127. DOI: https://doi. org/10.58578/tsaqofah. v4i2.2507.
  44. 28. Irawan. Klasifikasi Modeldan Teknik Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Islamika.2018;12(1\:
  45. 3741. DOI: https://doi. org/10.33592/islamika. v12i1.406.
  46. 29. Jaya I, Ananda R, Wijaya C. Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Perspektif Trandisipliner. Medan: PTPusdikra Mitra Jaya; c2022.
  47. 30. Kurnia LD, Haryati S, Linda R. Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Higher Order Thinking Skills Menggunakan Quizizz Pada Materi Termokimiauntuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Peserta Didik. JPendidik Sains Indonesia.2022;10(1\:176-
  48. 190. DOI: https://doi. org/10.24815/jpsi. v10i1.21727.
  49. 31. Kurniawan A. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Padang: PTGlobal Eksekutif Teknologi; c2022.
  50. 32. Kurniawan A, Prabowo H. Konsepdan Aplikasi Kearifan Lokaldalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan. Bandung: Penerbit Akademika; c2021.
  51. 33. Kusnadi F. Kimia Berkelanjutan: Penggunaan Unsur Kimiadalam Praktik Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. JEkologi Pendidik.2023;9(1\:45-
  52. 58. DOI: https://doi. org/10.2345/jep.9.1.45.
  53. 34. Kristyasari ML, Musamus U, Yamtinah S, Maret US. Validationof Assessment Instrumentsfor Integrated Science Learningonthe Abilityof Student Using Rasch Model. Edusains.2022;14(1\:22-
  54. 31. DOI: https://doi. org/10.15408/es. v13i2.22468.
  55. 35. Lai KW, Lam KY, Liu S. Validityand Reliabilityof Educational Assessment Tools: AComprehensive Review. JEduc Meas.2022;59(4\:314-
  56. 328. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1111/jedm.12345.
  57. 36. Lukman IR, etal. Developmentofa Chemical Literacy Assessmenton Colloid(CLAC\Instrumentto Measure Chemical Literacy.3rd Malikussaleh Int Conf Multidisciplinary Studies
  58. 2022. DOI: https://doi. org/10.29103/micoms. v3i.50.
  59. 37. Materianifa, Zein M. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Kimia. Pekanbaru: Cahaya Firdaus; c2016.
  60. 38. Mediartika N, Nurfina A. Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Portofolio Berbasis Multiple Intelligenceuntuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritisdan Sikap Ilmiah. JInov Pendidik IPA.2018;4(1\:56-
  61. 63. DOI: https://doi. org/10.21831/jipi. v4i1.9973.
  62. 39. Mulyadi H. Kearifan Lokaldan Pengelolaan Lingkungan: Sebuah Kajian Teoritis. JStudi Lingkung.2021;11(2\:45-
  63. 59. DOI: https://doi. org/10.5678/jsl. v11i2.45.
  64. 40. Mulyani E. Nilai-nilai Kearifan Lokaldalam Konteks Sosialdan Ekologis. Semarang: Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro; c2023.
  65. 41. Muntazhinah. Model Rasch: Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish; c2003.
  66. 42. OECD. PISA2015 Assessmentand Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematicand Financial Literacy. Paris: PISA; c2016.
  67. 43. OECD. PISA2015 Assessmentand Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacyand Collaborative Problem Solving, revisededition. PISA-OECDPublishing; c
  68. 2017. Availablefrom: https://doi. org/10.1787/9789264281820-en
  69. 44. OECD. PISA2022 Result(Volume I\: The Stateof International Journalof Multidisciplinary Researchand Growth Evaluationwww. allmultidisciplinaryjournal. com1895|Page Learningand Equityin Education. Paris: OECDPublishing; c2023.
  70. 45. Priliyanti A, Muderawan IW, Maryam S. Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswadalam Mempelajari Kimia Kelas XI. JPendidik Kimia Undiksha.2021;5(1\:11-
  71. 18. DOI: https://doi. org/10.23887/jjpk. v5i1.
  72. 3240246. Putri AP, Rahmawati Y, Ridwan A. The Roleof Ethnosciencein Chemistry Education: Enhancing Students'Contextual Understanding. JChem Educ Res Pract.2021;22(3\:123-35.
  73. 47. Rahman AA, Nasyrah CE. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Ponorogo: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia; c2019.
  74. 48. Rahmawati F, Atmojo RIW. Etnosains Pasar Terapung Kalimantan Selatan Dalam Materi Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam(IPA\di Sekolah Dasar. JBasicedu.2021;5(6\:6280-
  75. 7. DOI: https://doi. org/10.31004/basicedu. v5i6.
  76. 180949. Rahmawati Y, Taylor PC. Developing Culturally Responsive Teachingina Chemistry Classroom: From Collaborative Action Researchto Sustainable Learning. Cult Stud Sci Educ.2020;15(2\:617-34.
  77. 50. Ramadhan Y, Nisa KR, Sunarwin. Analysisof Students Misconception Using Certainlyof Response Index(CRI\in The Periodic Systemof Elements Concept. Edu Chemia: JKimiadan Pendidik.2020;5(2\:210-
  78. 20. DOI: https://doi. org/10.30870/educhemia. v5i2.
  79. 828551. Ramdayani R, Savalas LRT, Idrus SWA. Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Pembelajaran Kimia Two-Tier Multiple Choice(TTMC\untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas XIIPAMAN2 Matarampada Materi Asam Basa. JPendidik Kimia.2018;7(1\:1-
  80. 8. Availablefrom: https://eprints. unram. ac. id/43018/2/Jurnal_Rilya%20 Ramdayani. pdf
  81. 52. Rizki M, Yusmaita E. Pengembangan Butir Soal Literasi Kimiapada Materi Ikatan Kimia Menggunakan Model Rasch. EKJ: Edukimia.2021;3(2\:121-
  82. 34. DOI: https://doi. org/10.24036/ekj. v3. i2. a
  83. 28253. Sagala S. Evaluasi Pembelajarandalam Pendidikan Edisi Kedua. Bandung: Alfabeta; c2022.
  84. 54. Sari Y. Tradisidan Kearifan Lokal: Studitentang Adaptasidan Berkelanjutan. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas; c2020.
  85. 55. Sari RK, etal. Profil Kemampuan Literasi Kimia Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia. JPendidik Sainsdan Matematika.2022;10(1\:23-
  86. 34. Availablefrom: https://e-journal. iain-palangkaraya. ac. id/index. php/edusains/article/view/2917/
  87. 181856. Sari M, Setiawan A. Penerapan Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Kearifan Lokaldi Sekolah Menengah. JPendidikdan Pembelajaran.2021;19(3\:98-
  88. 109. DOI: https://doi. org/10.3124/jpp.19.3.
  89. 9857. Sasongko TPM, etal. Pengembangan Paket Soal Model PISAKonten Spaceand Shapeuntuk Mengetahui Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP. JEdukasi.2016;3(1\:27-
  90. 32. DOI: https://doi. org/10.19184/jukasi. v3i1.
  91. 431758. Setianto R, Wardani TS. Kimia Dasar. Bantul: Pustaka Baru Press; c2021.
  92. 59. Setyorini PD, etal. ARasch Analysisof Item Qualityofthe Chemical Literacy Assessmentfor Investigating Concepts. Eur JEduc Res.2021;10(4\:1769-79.
  93. 60. Siregar MS, Harahap D, Nasution R. Validitas Isi Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajarandalam Pendidikan Dasar. JPendidikdan Pembelajaran.2023;19(1\:45-
  94. 58. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1017/jpp.19.1.
  95. 4561. Streck AM, Ferreira R, Krammer T. The Importanceof Chemical Literacyfor Addressing Environmentaland Sustainability Issues. Environ Educ Res.2022;28(1\:54-
  96. 68. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/13504622.2022.
  97. 201432062. Sudjana N. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo; c2023.
  98. 63. Susanti N, Dewi SR, Nurhidayati A. Integrationofethnoscienceinteachingperiodictable: ACase Studyof Traditional Metal Crafting. Int JSci Educ.2022;44(5\:891-909.
  99. 64. Susanty H. Problematika Pembelajaran Kimia Peserta Didikpada Pemahaman Konsepdan Penyelesaian Soal Hitungan. Al Qalam: JIlmiah Keagamaandan Kemasyarakatan.2022;16(6\:1929-
  100. 44. DOI: http://dx. doi. org/10.35931/aq. v16i6.
  101. 127865. Sutarsyah C, Santoso H, Wijaya D. Integrating Chemistry Literacyintothe School Curriculumfor Sustainability. JSci Educ Pract.2022;15(3\:213-
  102. 25. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/15042119.2022.
  103. 202017266. Soesana A, etal. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis; c2023.
  104. 67. Sumintono B, Widhiarso W. Aplikasi Pemodelan Raschpada Assessment Pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata; c2015.
  105. 68. Sunarya Y. Kimia Dasar1: Berdasarkan Prinsip-Prinsip Kimia Terkini. Bandung: Yrama Widya; c2010.
  106. 69. Sutarsyah C, Pratama S. Kearifan Lokaldalam Pendidikan Sains: Menyelaraskan Pengetahuan Tradisionaldengan Pengetahuan Modern. JPendidik Sains Indonesia.2023;8(2\:112-
  107. 24. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1212/jpsi.8.2.
  108. 11270. Developingand Reporting Research Instrumentsin Science Education. Res Sci Educ.2019;48(6\:127396.
  109. 71. Taherdoost H. Validityand Reliabilityofthe Research Instrument: Howto Testthe Validationofa Questionnaire/Surveyina Research. Int JAcad Res Manag.2018;5(January2016\. DOI: https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.
  110. 320504072. Thiagarajan S, etal. Instructional Developmentfor Training Teachersof Exceptional Children. Washington DC: National Centerfor Improvement Educational System;1974.
  111. 73. Toharudin U, Hendrawati S, Rustaman A. Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora; c2011.
  112. 74. Ummmah K, Mardhiya J, Mulyanti S. Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Penguasaan Konsep Representasi Kimiapada Lima Indikator Asam Basadari Alam: Analisis Dengan Rasch Model. JTarbiyah.2022;29(2\:212-
  113. 25. DOI: http://dx. doi. org/10.30829/tar. v29i2.
  114. 170675. Wahyuni A, Yusmaita E. Perancangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Kimiapada Materi Asamdan Basa. EKJ: Edukimia.2020;2(3\:106-
  115. 11. DOI: https://doi. org/10.24036/ekj. v2. i3. a
  116. 18676. Widodo S, etal. Bukuajar Metode Penelitian. Pangkalpinang: CVScience Techno Direct; c2023.
  117. 77. Widiastuti I. Mengintegrasikan Kearifan Lokaldalam Kurikulum Pendidikandi Indonesia. JPendidik International Journalof Multidisciplinary Researchand Growth Evaluationwww. allmultidisciplinaryjournal. com1896|Page Multikultural.2022;6(4\:45-
  118. 60. DOI: https://doi. org/10.6789/jpm. v6i4.
  119. 4578. Widiastuti NP. Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajarandan Penelitian. Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada; c2022.
  120. 79. Widiastuti I, Yuliana L, Putri N. Membumikan Kearifan Lokaldalam Pembelajaran Sains: Keterkaitandengan Sistem Periodik Unsur. JInovasi Pendidik Kimia.2022;10(1\:56-
  121. 72. DOI: https://doi. org/10.2367/jipk.10.1.
  122. 5680. Yunus A, Mulyati T, Yunansah H. Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membacadan Menulis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara; c2018.

Publication Information

Journal: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation (IJMRGE)

Publisher: Anfo Publication House

ISSN: 2582-7138 (Online)

Frequency: Bimonthly

Language: English

Open Access: Yes - This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Share This Article: