A novel approach for accounting of the use phase emissions for connected devices
Abstract
Reducing the life cycle emissions of connected devices is essential for mitigating their environmental impact as their proliferation accelerates. These devices, including consumer electronics and Internet of Things (IoT) systems, contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, with their use phase often dominating their overall environmental footprint due to high electricity consumption. Data centers, IoT edge devices, and semiconductor logic chips exemplify how operational energy use can surpass manufacturing emissions, highlighting the need for energy-efficient designs. Implementing eco-design principles, optimizing communication protocols, and integrating low-power components can enhance sustainability. This paper explores decarbonization strategies for the use phase of connected devices through four key principles: 1) enabling better measurement, 2) energy efficiency, 3) renewable energy matching, and 4) carbon offsets. It also examines the need to update carbon footprint methodologies to incorporate real-time energy monitoring, enhancing the accuracy of emissions reporting and facilitating targeted interventions for reducing environmental impact.
How to Cite This Article
Zaid Thanawala (2023). A novel approach for accounting of the use phase emissions for connected devices . International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation (IJMRGE), 4(5), 1128-1131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMRGE.2023.4.5.1128-1131
References
- 1. Teehan P. Integrativeapproachestoenvironmentallifecycleassessmentofconsumerelectronicsandconnectedhttps://doi. org/10.14288/1.
- 1674962. Pirson T, Bol D. Assessingtheembodiedcarbonfootprintof Io Tedgedeviceswithabottom-uplife-cycle2021.
- 3. Farrant L, Guern YL. Whichenvironmentalimpactsfor ICT?-LCAcasestudyonelectronicmail. In: Electronics Goes Green;2012.
- 4. Cheung CW, Berger M, Finkbeiner M. Comparativelifecycleassessmentofre-useandreplacementforvideoprojectors. Int JLife Cycle Assess.2018;23(4\:856-
- 67. Availablefrom: https://doi. org/10.1007/S11367-017-1301-
- 35. Boyd S. Life-Cycle Assessmentof CMOSLogicblefrom: https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9988-7_
- 56. Boyd S, Horvath A, Dornfeld D. Life-cycleassessmentofcomputationallogicproducedfrom1995through
- 2010. Environ Res Lett.2010;5(1\:
- 14011. Availablefrom: https://doi. org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/
- 140117. Ochoa MLA, He H, Schoenung JM, Helminen E, Okrasinski T, Schaeffer B, etal. Designparametersandenvironmentalimpactofprintedwiringboardmanufacture. JClean Prod.2019;237:
- 117807. Availablefrom: https://doi. org/10.1016/J. JCLEPRO.2019.
- 1178078. Me Io Tintermsofsystemapproach. In: International Conventionon Informationand Communication Technology, Electronicsand Microelectronics;
- 2022. Availablefrom: https://doi. org/10.23919/MIPRO55190.2022.
- 98036659. Bettenhausen C. Industryeyeswiderscopeof CO2https://doi. org/10.1021/cen-10002-cover210. scope3standardberealized?JClean Prod.2018;176:391-
- 401. Availablefrom: https://doi. org/10.1016/J. JCLEPRO.2018.03.
- 311. Gonz?lez IG, Fern?ndez MR, Peralta JJ, Cort?s A. AHolistic Approachto Energy Efficiency Management Systems. In: International Conferenceon Software Engineering Advances;2012.
- 12. Quittek J, Christensen K, Nordman B. Energy-efficient-
- 7. Availablefrom: https://doi. org/10.1109/MNET.2011.
- 573052113. Sanchez M, Brown RE, Webber C, Homan G. Savingsestimatesforthe United States Environmental Protectionprogram. Energy Policy.2008;36(6\:2002-
- 12. Availablefrom: https://doi. org/10.1016/J. ENPOL.2008.02.
- 2114. Gillenwater M, Lu X, Fischlein M. Additionalityof Wind Energy Investmentsinthe U. S. Voluntary Green Power Market. Renewable Energy.2014;66:274-
- 81. Availablefrom: https://doi. org/10.1016/J. RENENE.2013.10.
- 315. Friess DA, Howard J, Huxham M, Macreadie PI, Ross F. Capitalizingontheglobalfinancialinterestinbluecarbon. PLOSClim.2022;1(1\: e
- 61. Availablefrom: https://doi. org/10.1371/journal. pclm.0000061.