International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation  |  ISSN (Online): 2582-7138  |  Double-Blind Peer Review  |  Open Access  |  CC BY 4.0

Current Issues
     2026:7/3

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation

ISSN (Online): 2582-7138 | Open Access

Child Safety in the Digital Age: Historical lessons from media regulation and their application to modern Cybersecurity Policies

Author(s):

Published:

Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 735-742

Subject: Management

Country: United Kingdom

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMRGE.2021.2.1.735-742

License: CC BY 4.0

Full Text (PDF)

Open Access - Free to Download

Download Full Article (PDF)

Alternative download link

Abstract

As children increasingly engage with digital content, ensuring their safety online has become a critical policy concern. Historically, media regulations such as television, radio, and film censorship were implemented to shield minors from harmful content, shaping public discourse around child protection. This article examines historical media regulations, including the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines, the Children’s Television Act (1990), and the Motion Picture Production Code, to extract key lessons relevant to contemporary cybersecurity policies. Modern digital threats, including exposure to harmful materials, cyberbullying, and privacy breaches, require a nuanced regulatory approach that accounts for the decentralized and global nature of online platforms. While existing frameworks, such as the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for minors, provide some safeguards, enforcement remains a challenge. Furthermore, content moderation by social media companies is often inconsistent, raising concerns about effectiveness and censorship. This proposes a hybrid policy framework that integrates historical lessons with modern technological solutions. AI-driven parental controls, featuring adaptive content filtering and real-time monitoring, can enhance child safety while allowing flexibility for different age groups. Additionally, community-based digital literacy programs led by schools, parents, and public-private partnerships can equip children with critical thinking skills to navigate online risks. The ethical implications of such policies, particularly regarding privacy and children’s digital rights, are also considered. By drawing on historical precedents and leveraging contemporary technological advancements, this study advocates for a balanced, multi-stakeholder approach to online child safety. A combination of regulatory oversight, AI-enhanced tools, and education initiatives can create a safer digital environment while preserving children’s rights to explore and learn in the online world.

How to Cite This Article

Nkoyo Lynn Majebi, Omotoke Modinat Drakeford (2021). Child Safety in the Digital Age: Historical lessons from media regulation and their application to modern Cybersecurity Policies . International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation (IJMRGE), 2(1), 735-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMRGE.2021.2.1.735-742

Export Citation:

BibTeX RIS EndNote

References

  1. 1. Andersen K, Renza V, Fieseler C, Mc Dermott F, Mc Gannon R, Papadopoulos A. Thesocialandcivicimpactofthearts. Artsformation Report Series.2020.(Forthcoming\.
  2. 2. Beemsterboer S. COPPAkilledthevideostar: Howthe You Tubesettlementshowsthat COPPAdoesmoreharmthangood. Stephen Beemsterboer, COPPAKilledthe Video Star: Howthe You Tube Settlement Showsthat COPPADoes More Harm Than Good.2020;25.
  3. 3. Bhagwat A. Thelawof Facebook. UCDavis Law Review.2020;54:2353.
  4. 4. RM, Green CS, Arnold D, etal. Digitalgamesasacontextforchildren'scognitivedevelopment: Researchrecommendationsandpolicyconsiderations. Social Policy Report.2019;32(1\:1-33.
  5. 5. Browne MN, Kubasek N, Rex J, Horton R. Commercializingchildren: Lawsandregulationsaffectingadvertisementsdirectedatchildrenin France, Spain, and Sweden. Indiana International&Comparative Law Review.2018;28:163.
  6. 6. Calvert C. The FCCandprofanelanguage: Thelugubriouslegacyofamoralpanicandagrosslyoffensivedefinitionthatmustbejettisoned. First Amendment Law Review.2018;17:147.
  7. 7. Chang LY, Coppel N. Buildingcybersecurityawarenessinadevelopingcountry: Lessonsfrom Myanmar. Computers&Security.2020;97:101959.
  8. 8. Childs KJ.(Re\Countingfactsandbuildingequity: Fiveargumentsforanincreasedemphasisonstorytellinginthelegalcurriculum. Boston University Public Interest Law Journal.2019;29:315.
  9. 9. Cobbe J, Singh J. Regulatingrecommending: Motivations, considerations, andprinciples. Considerations, and Principles.2019 Apr15.
  10. 10. Fatima S, Desouza KC, Dawson GS. Nationalstrategicartificialintelligenceplans: Amulti-dimensionalanalysis. Economic Analysisand Policy.2020;67:178-194.
  11. 11. Flensburg S, Lai SS. Mappingdigitalcommunicationsystems: Infrastructures, markets, andpoliciesasregulatoryforces. Media, Culture&Society.2020;42(5\:692-710.
  12. 12. Fourie L. Protectingchildreninthedigitalsociety. Childhood Vulnerabilitiesin South Africa: Some Ethical Perspectives.2020:229-272.
  13. 13. Franco L, Ghanayim K. Thecriminalizationofcyberbullyingamongchildrenandyouth. Santa Clara Journalof International Law.2019;17: i.
  14. 14. Fuenzalida V. Constructivist TVreceptioninthe America. Routledge;2019. p.211-224.
  15. 15. Gerwin RL, Kaliebe K, Daigle M. Theinterplaybetweendigitalmediauseanddevelopment. Childand Adolescent Psychiatric Clinicsof North America.2018;27(2\:345-355.
  16. 16. Gillespie T. Regulationofandbyplatforms. In: The SAGEHandbookof Social Media. SAGE;2018. p.254-278.
  17. 17. Gillespie T, Aufderheide P, Carmi E, Gerrard Y, Gorwa R, Matamoros-Fern?ndez A, etal. Expandingthedebateaboutcontentmoderation: Scholarlyresearchagendasforthecomingpolicydebates. Internet Policy Review.2020;9(4\:1-29.
  18. 18. Gorwa R. Theplatformgovernancetriangle: Conceptualizingtheinformalregulationofonlinecontent. Internet Policy Review.2019;8(2\:1-22.
  19. 19. Gorwa R, Binns R, Katzenbach C. Algorithmiccontentmoderation: Technicalandpoliticalchallengesintheautomationofplatformgovernance. Big Data&Society.2020;7(1\:2053951719897945.
  20. 20. Gunter B, Gunter J. Childrenand Television. Routledge;2019.
  21. 21. Hale L, Kirschen GW, Le Bourgeois MK, Gradisar M, Garrison MM, Montgomery-Downs H, etal. Youthscreenmediahabitsandsleep: Sleep-friendlyscreenbehaviorrecommendationsforclinicians, educators, andparents. Childand Adolescent Psychiatric Clinicsof North America.2018;27(2\:229-245.
  22. 22. Head AJ, Fister B, Mac Millan M. Informationliteracyintheageofalgorithms: Studentexperienceswithnewsandinformation, andtheneedforchange. Project Information Literacy.2020.
  23. 23. H?der M. Acriticismof AIethicsguidelines. Inform?ci?s T?rsadalom: T?rsadalomtudom?nyi Foly?irat.2020;20(4\:57-73.
  24. 24. Humann HD. Another Me: The Doppelgangerin21st Century Fiction, Televisionand Film. Mc Farland;2018.
  25. 25. Jaeger PT, Taylor NG. Foundationsof Information Policy. American Library Association;2019.
  26. 26. Kitchin R, Dodge M. The(in\securityofsmartcities: Vulnerabilities, risks, mitigation, andprevention. In: Smart Citiesand Innovative Urban Technologies. Routledge;2020. p.47-
  27. 65. International Journalof Multidisciplinary Researchand Growth Evaluationwww. allmultidisciplinaryjournal. com
  28. 74227. Krone T, Spiranovic C, Prichard J, Watters P, Wortley R, Gelb K, etal. Childsexualabusematerialinchild-centredinstitutions: Situationalcrimepreventionapproaches. Journalof Sexual Aggression.2020;26(1\:91-110.
  29. 28. Lievens E, Livingstone S, Mc Laughlin S, O'Neill B, logies.
  30. 29. Livingstone S, Stoilova M, Nandagiri R. Children'sdataandprivacyonline: Growingupinadigitalage: Anevidencereview. London Schoolof Economicsand Political Science.2019.
  31. 30. Luke A, Carmen L. Adolescencelost/childhoodregained: Onearlyinterventionandtheemergenceofthetechno-subject. In: Critical Literacy, Schooling, and Social Justice. Routledge;2018. p.189-215.
  32. 31. Magarian GP. Forwardintothepast: Speechintermediariesintelevisionandinternetages. Oklahoma Law Review.2018;71:237.
  33. 32. Manheim K, Kaplan L. Artificialintelligence: Riskstoprivacyanddemocracy. Yale Journalof Law&Technology.2019;21:106.
  34. 33. Masten AS. Resiliencetheoryandresearchonchildrenandfamilies: Past, present, andpromise. Journalof Family Theory&Review.2018;10(1\:12-31.
  35. 34. Matthew KA, Akinwale FM, Opia FN, Adenike A. Therelationshipbetweenoralcontraceptiveuse, mammographicbreastdensity, andbreastcancerrisk.2021.
  36. 35. Mc Dougall J, Zezulkova M, Van Driel B, Sternadel D. Teachingmedialiteracyin Europe: Evidenceofeffectiveschoolpracticesinprimaryandsecondaryeducation. NESETIIReport.2018.
  37. 36. Michael K, Kobran S, Abbas R, Hamdoun S. Privacy, datarightsandcybersecurity: Technologyforgoodintheachievementofsustainabledevelopmentgoals. In:2019IEEEInternational Symposiumon Technologyand Society(ISTAS\IEEE;2019. p.1-13.
  38. 37. Nawaila MB, Kanbul S, Ozdamli F. Areviewontherightsofchildreninthedigitalage. Childrenand Youth Services Review.2018;94:390-409.
  39. 38. Nurik C.50shadesoffilmcensorship: Genderbiasfromthe Hays Codeto MPAAratings. Communication, Culture&Critique.2018;11(4\:530-547.
  40. 39. Pecora PJ, Whittaker JK, Barth RP, Borja S, Vesneski W. The Child Welfare Challenge: Policy, Practice, and Research. Routledge;2018.
  41. 40. Perry B, Scrivens R. Right-Wing Extremismin Canada. Springer Nature;2019.
  42. 41. Pienta D, Thatcher JB, Johnston A. Protectingawhaleinaseaofphish. Journalof Information Technology.2020;35(3\:214-231.
  43. 42. Rowbotham S, Astell-Burt T, Barakat T, Hawe P.30+yearsofmediaanalysisofrelevancetochronicdisease: Ascopingreview. BMCPublic Health.2020;20:1-21.
  44. 43. Ruckenstein M, Turunen LLM. Re-humanizingtheplatform: Contentmoderatorsandthelogicofcare. New Media&Society.2020;22(6\:1026-1042.
  45. 44. Sagar R, Jhaveri R, Borrego C. Applicationsinsecurityandevasionsinmachinelearning: Asurvey. Electronics.2020;9(1\:97.
  46. 45. Theimpactofdigitalconnectivetechnologies. Journalof Educational Technologyand Online Learning.2019;2(1\:1-15.
  47. 46. Setyaningsih E. Adaptingelementaryschoolcurriculuminnovationinlineby4IRandcultures. In:2nd Educational Sciences International Conference(ESIC2019\. Atlantis Press;2020 Apr. p.81-91.
  48. 47. Singh RD. Mappingonlinechildsafetyin Asiaandthe Pacific. Asia&the Pacific Policy Studies.2018;5(3\:651-664.
  49. 48. Soh C, Connolly D, Nam S. Themainchallengesrelatedtoprotectinghumanrightsontheinternet. In: Human Rights, Digital Societyandthe Law. Routledge;2019. p.89-102.
  50. 49. Timmer J. Changesinthechildren'stelevisionmarketplace, the Children's Television Act, andthe First Amendment. Cardozo Arts&Entertainment Law Journal.2019;37:731.
  51. 50. Valdivia AN. Whatcanwegetawaywith?: Theethicsofartandentertainmentintheneoliberalworld. In: The Routledge Handbookof Mass Media Ethics. Routledge;2020. p.264-275.
  52. 51. Van Gent D. The Federal Communications Commissionanditsderegulationofmedia: Encouraginginnovationorinhibitingdemocracy. Drake Law Review.2019;67:1037.

Publication Information

Journal: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation (IJMRGE)

Publisher: Anfo Publication House

ISSN: 2582-7138 (Online)

Frequency: Bimonthly

Language: English

Open Access: Yes - This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Share This Article: