International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation  |  ISSN (Online): 2582-7138  |  Double-Blind Peer Review  |  Open Access  |  CC BY 4.0

Current Issues
     2026:7/3

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation

ISSN (Online): 2582-7138 | Open Access

Exploring the Competence–Performance Gap among EFL Learners: A Chomskyan Perspective

Author(s):

Published:

Volume: 6 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 669-679

Subject: English

Country: Iraq

License: CC BY 4.0

Full Text (PDF)

Open Access - Free to Download

Download Full Article (PDF)

Alternative download link

Abstract

Background: The competence–performance distinction introduced by Chomsky has been a cornerstone in linguistics, yet its implications for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners remain underexplored. Many EFL students demonstrate adequate linguistic competence but struggle to transfer this knowledge into accurate and fluent performance. Addressing this gap is vital for both theoretical understanding and effective pedagogy.
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the competence–performance gap among Arabic-speaking EFL learners from a Chomskyan perspective. Specifically, it examined the extent to which learners’ grammatical knowledge translates into performance, and how cognitive, affective, and pedagogical factors contribute to this gap.
Methods & Procedures: A mixed-methods design was adopted involving 132 undergraduate EFL learners at the University of Diyala. Standardized grammar and vocabulary tests were used to assess competence, while oral and written production tasks measured performance. Learners also completed anxiety and motivation questionnaires. Quantitative data were analyzed using t-tests, correlations, and regression models, while qualitative interviews provided insights into learners’ experiences. Ethical approval was secured and informed consent obtained from all participants.
Outcomes & Results: Findings revealed a significant disparity between competence and performance scores. Learners demonstrated higher competence in grammar and vocabulary than they were able to apply in communicative tasks. Regression analyses identified language anxiety, limited exposure to authentic input, and reliance on rote instruction as major predictors of the performance gap. Qualitative data reinforced these results, highlighting the role of classroom practices and affective constraints.
Conclusions & Implications: The study confirms the persistence of a competence–performance gap among EFL learners and emphasizes the need to address both linguistic knowledge and performance conditions. Pedagogically, the findings suggest integrating communicative approaches, reducing anxiety through supportive classroom environments, and providing richer exposure to authentic input. Theoretically, the study extends Chomsky’s distinction into applied linguistics, demonstrating its relevance for understanding learner variability in EFL contexts. These results carry important implications for curriculum design, teacher training, and inclusive pedagogical strategies. 
 

How to Cite This Article

Hind N Farhan (2025). Exploring the Competence–Performance Gap among EFL Learners: A Chomskyan Perspective . International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation (IJMRGE), 6(6), 669-679.

Export Citation:

BibTeX RIS EndNote

References

  1. 1. Aldubai N, Almehdi K. Collocationcompetenceofthe EFLlearnersanditsrelationshiptotheir English Dec. https://doi. org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23240.
  2. 25622. Al-Ibadi QH. Apragmaticcompetence, languageproficiencyandwritingperformanceof Iraqi EFLuniversitystudents: acorrelationalstudy[Internet Availablefrom: https://www. researchgate. net/publication/
  3. 3665697413. Boualli H, Boudiaf A. Implementingdifferentiatedinterculturalcompetence: voicesfroman Algeriansecondaryschoolcontext. JLang Transl.2025;5(2\:126-37.
  4. 4. Calafato R, Hunstadbr?ten S. Literatureinlanguageprofiles. Engl Teach Learn.2024. doi:10.1007/s42321-024-00193-w
  5. 5. Chomsky N. Aspectsofthetheoryofsyntax. Cambridge(MA\: MITPress;1965.
  6. 6. Corder SP. Erroranalysisandinterlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press;1981.
  7. 7. Ellis R. Measuringimplicitandexplicitknowledgeofasecondlanguage: apsychometricstudy. Stud Second Lang Acquis.2005;27(2\:141-72.
  8. 8. Fukushima K. Competenceandperformancerevisited: theimplicationsofsocialroletermsin Japanesewww. elsevier. com/locate/pragma
  9. 9. Gawin C. Relationalschematain BERTareinducible, notemergent: astudyofperformancevs. competencein2025: ar Xiv:2506.
  10. 11485. Availablefrom: International Journalof Multidisciplinary Researchand Growth Evaluationwww. allmultidisciplinaryjournal. com679|Pagehttp://arxiv. org/abs/2506.
  11. 1148510. Godfroid A, Loewen S, Jung S, Park JH, Gass S, Ellis R. Timedanduntimedgrammaticalityjudgmentsmeasuredistincttypesofknowledge: evidencefromeye-movementpatterns. Stud Second Lang Acquis.2015;37(2\:269-97.
  12. 11. Horwitz EK, Horwitz MB, Cope J. Foreignlanguageclassroomanxiety. Mod Lang J.1986;70(2\:125-32.
  13. 12. Ishihara T, Hamada A. Evaluatingthevalidityofweb-basedreaction-timetasksforassessing L2grammaticalknowledgeinyounglearners. Res Methods Appl Linguist.2025;4(3\:100228.
  14. 13. Kormos J. Speechproductionandsecondlanguageacquisition. New York: Routledge;2014.
  15. 14. Krashen SD. Principlesandpracticeinsecondlanguageacquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press;1982.
  16. 15. Luo Z, Xiong Y. Isanxietyalwaysharmful?Anexplorationoftheimpactoflanguageanxietyon EFLlearningmotivation, EFLcompetenceand EFLacademicperformance. BMCPsychol.2025;13(1\:3017.
  17. 16. Mac Intyre PD, Gardner RC. Thesubtleeffectsoflanguageanxietyoncognitiveprocessinginthesecondlanguage. Lang Learn.1994;44(2\:283-305.
  18. 17. Mpofu N. Languageteachingincontentsubjects: postinitialteachereducationnarrativesof South Africanbeginnerteachers. TESOLJ.2025;16(4\: e70070.
  19. 18. Pandit BR. Mothertonguebasedinstructionfordevelopingcommunicativecompetenceof EFLlearners: teac2025;10(1-2\:73-82.
  20. 19. Pardede A, Dirgantari AS, ASHC, Susantiningdyah H. Exploringrequeststrategiesby Indonesian EFLlearners. JAppl Linguist.2025;5(1\:65-74.
  21. 20. Riyadh E, Khalil HU, Elaf A, Khalil R. Volume(62\Issue(4\Appendix(1\Year(2024\. Alustath JHum Soc Sci.2024;62(4 Appendix1\.21. explicit, and/orimplicitgrammaticalknowledge. Lang Learn.2024;74(4\:1120-48.
  22. 22. Segalowitz N. Cognitivebasesofsecondlanguagefluency. New York: Routledge;2010.
  23. 23. Suman MD. Significanceofpragmaticsinsecondlanguageacquisition: enhancingcommunicationandinterculturalcompetence. Inverge JSoc Sci.
  24. 24. Vafaee P, Suzuki Y, Kachisnke I. Validatinggrammaticalityjudgmenttests. Stud Second Lang Acquis.2017;39(1\:59-95.
  25. 25. Yalew MY, Amogne D, Chanie BS. Effectsofpragmaticsawarenessinstruction(PAI\inenhancing Educ.2025;12(1\:2528305.
  26. 26. Zhou F, Li F. Exploringacademicdiscursivewritingofresearcharticles. Innov Appl Linguist.2025;1(1\.

Publication Information

Journal: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation (IJMRGE)

Publisher: Anfo Publication House

ISSN: 2582-7138 (Online)

Frequency: Bimonthly

Language: English

Open Access: Yes - This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Share This Article: