The Salesforce DevOps tooling market has matured substantially, presenting organizations with a range of platform options that differ significantly in their architectural assumptions, deployment automation capabilities, version control integration models, and governance support features. Despite this proliferation of tooling options, the literature lacks a systematic comparative framework through which organizations can evaluate competing tools against consistent criteria grounded in DevOps theory and enterprise deployment practice. This paper proposes a comparative framework for evaluating Salesforce DevOps tooling, with particular focus on three leading platforms: Copado, Flosum, and Salesforce DX. The framework is organized around six evaluation dimensions: pipeline architecture and deployment automation, version control integration and branching strategy support, test automation and quality gate enforcement, sandbox and environment management, security and compliance controls, and total cost of adoption. The paper applies the framework to compare Copado, Flosum, and Salesforce DX across these dimensions, synthesizing evidence from technical documentation, practitioner literature, and deployment case reports. The comparative analysis reveals that each platform presents distinct capability profiles suited to different organizational contexts, and that hybrid tooling configurations combining Salesforce DX with either dedicated DevOps platform offer capabilities that neither component provides independently.