The role of the police is described by Egon Bittner as "a mechanism for the distribution of non-negotiable coercive force based on a doctrine of intuitive comprehension of situational exigencies" (Bittner, 1970/1990:131). In reading this definition, one should also take into consideration Max Weber's observation that the State is defined by its monopoly on the use of legitimate force (Weber, 1946) and Norbert Elias's discussion of how violence becomes domesticated in western society (Elias, 1989; 1995). Across the methodical writings of diverse nation states, it remains the standard explanation of the function of the police with slight variations (Bayley, 1983; Monjardet, 1996; Funk, 1986; Schneider, 1987; Lofthouse, 1996; Waddington, 1999). Therefore, the connection amongst coerciveness and policing is not considered inherently problematic, but rather as unquestionable. Nigeria, however, still faces challenges concerning power abuse in national policing, particularly in the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS). This paper addresses the policing dilemma in Nigeria under democratic leadership, recognizing the security concern that police abuse causes to Nigerians. This study examines the brutality, extortion, and violence perpetrated by members of the Nigerian Police Force using a qualitative approach and secondary data (NPF). The study recommends extensive reforms aimed at decentralizing the force's management, establishing credible and effective internal and external control, training, public awareness campaigns, and more budget for the agency.