Abstract

This study evaluates the activity of the Collective Compelling Policy (KZP) through Syrian and Libya interventions. In the study, intervention processes in two cases; Pre -intervention conditions were examined in terms of the strategic objectives of international actors, military and diplomatic methods applied and the sustainability of the results. Using the qualitative comparative analysis method, official documents, international establishment reports, academic studies and data obtained from media sources were analyzed. The findings reveal that despite the rapid results in Libya intervention, long -term stability cannot be achieved, and in Syria, it has failed to achieve the goals of the KZP. In both cases, international legitimacy, the conflicts of interest of regional actors and the inconsistencies in implementation strategies have come to the forefront as the main factors that limit the success of the KZP. The study offers preventive diplomacy, multilateral coordination and flexible strategic planning suggestions in order to apply more effectively in the future.